torsdag 12 juli 2012

Tommy Robinsons tal i Bryssel.

Tommy Robinson talar i Bryssel. Foto: Snaphanen.
Ja, det är tid att tala klarspråk. I Bryssel har just ett antal viktiga anti-islamister mötts. Jag har följt hela processen utan att säga ett ord. Det beror på att jag inväntat tillstånd att berätta. Det gör jag nu. Först skulle jag vilja att ni tittade och lyssnade till vad EDL-ledaren Tommy Robinson från Luton i England hade att säga, denna arbetarklass-kille bland alla intellektuella från Europa och USA. “I’m used to standing on the street corners and speaking to my fellow countrymen”, inledde han. Det är Österrikiska Elizabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff som hjälper honom med mikrofonen:




Tommy Robinson med en ortodox präst, Fader Samuel, vid mötet. Foto: Snaphanen.

På mötet i Bryssel antogs denna deklaration (och det finns goda skäl att läsa denna text noga): To Safeguard Individual Liberties and Human Right

 International Conference for 
Free Speech & Human Rights

To Preserve Free Speech, Civil Liberties, Human Rights and Democracy, against all efforts to injure and usurp those universal principles, we call upon leaders in all nations to support this 2012 Brussels Declaration to Safeguard Individual Liberties and Human Rights:
Reasserting that Human rights and liberties are universal, individual, equal, inalienable, and self-evident irrespective of philosophical, cultural or religious considerations, as a matter of long-held principle;
 Considering that any honest defender of Democracy has the right and the duty to uphold and defend free speech, civil liberties and human rights;
Affirming the irrefutable fact that sharia law as articulated and applied is incompatible with and destructive to free speech, civil liberties and human rights and as such is incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy (as stated in the 13 Feb 2003 judgment of the ECHR);
Acknowledging that the declaration known as “Cairo Declaration of Human Right in Islam” also commonly referred to as the “Cairo Declaration” curtails all human rights under sharia law and sharia normative behavior restrictions (CDHRI Articles 22, 23, 24)on the pretense that  “All human beings form one family whose members are united by their subordination to Allah”(CDHRI Article 1);
Observing that the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), being the creator of Cairo Declaration and its current main proponent has, by its  continuous and single-minded activity, proven to be the principal international politico-religious organization working to restrict free speech, civil liberties and human rights and to enforce sharia  in the world;
Asserting that any official endorsement or promotion of the Cairo Declaration or any cooperation with OIC that leads, by the test of consequences, to more enforcement of sharia anywhere in the world identifies its perpetrator as an active opponent of Democracy, freedom of speech, civil liberties and human rights;
Noting that such an identification renders illegitimate  any attempt by the perpetrator to discuss or negotiate matters involving freedom of speech, civil liberties and human rights in any local, national or international forums;

The signatories solemnly require of their governments and civil society:

1)      To commence a process, to be known as the Brussels Process, to implement the content of this declaration through education and policy initiatives at all levels of government and sectors of civil society, in order to safeguard the future liberties and rights of our nations and our children, so that all members of the human family may prosper as free individuals.
2)      To decline any invitation to participate in any local, national or international forum to discuss civil liberties, free speech or human rights, if the organizers – individual persons or organizations – are known proponents of the Cairo Declaration or societal sharia enforcement unless the negotiated or discussed topic  is a transition of their codification and implementation of human rights to the UNDHR definitions and away from the Cairo Declaration definitions.
3)      To protest against any kind of participation in a local, national or international meeting dedicated to civil liberties, free speech or human rights’ discussions or negotiations by any known proponents of the Cairo Declaration or societal sharia enforcements, unless they are only attending in an observational capacity or negotiating their entry in the Brussels Process.
4)      To initiate a thorough inquiry before any bilateral or multilateral cooperation about civil liberties, free speech or human rights related matters, in order to clearly identify any participants who are proponents for the Cairo Declaration or sharia law, or who have cooperated or collaborated with the OIC or its associated organizations.
5)      To reject and forbid any public funding for promotion of the Cairo Declaration or of any sharia societal implementation and enforcement, because such promotions are a direct attack against our most fundamental democratic principles and human rights.
6)      To stop any cooperation with all known proponents of the Cairo Declaration at a national or international level, when that cooperation has as its aim or result, a restriction of civil liberties, free speech or human rights in a democratic country, until those proponents repudiate the Cairo Declaration.
7)      To extend cooperation and support in all forums to former proponents of the Cairo Declaration who repudiate the suppression by the OIC and sharia law of civil liberties, free speech and human rights, and who assert that human rights and liberties are universal, individual, equal, inalienable, and self-evident irrespective of philosophical, cultural or religious considerations.
8)      To engage with civil society and official organizations that work to safeguard  individual liberties from suppression by shariah law, especially those located in nations that are signatories of the Cairo Declaration or members of the OIC, to encourage dialogue, education and understanding on individual liberties and human rights, as these terms have been commonly used in Western nations.

*****

Vill ni följa rapportering från mötet finns det bara en riktigt pålitlig sida för det. Det är Snaphanen, den dansk-svenska bloggen i Köpenhamn. Läs och lär. Det gör jag, varje dag. Och allt material i ord och bild ni finner här hos mig publiceras naturligtvis i samförstånd med Snaphanen.



1 kommentar:

  1. Lysande tal av Tommy Robinson! Hans genuina engagemang och intakta inre moraliska kompass är inte att ta miste på. Han är 2000-talets svar på August Palm. Vi skulle behöva någon med liknande utstrålning, förmåga och mod här i Sverige. Tack för rapporten!


    /Benge Runfalk

    SvaraRadera

Obs! Endast bloggmedlemmar kan kommentera.